Pistol brace reddit. The logic of this is just stunningly stupid.


I believe it can still be over 26" without a brace and be a "firearm. KS7. I guess my stance is if I’m trying to use a brace against my cheek like it’s 2016 (which I’m kinda used to doing now) having more height on the brace makes it’s easier to rest up on my face. The ATF's new guide for determining whether an item is a pistol brace or a rifle stock is a two-page, 46-question "scorecard". Like everyone else I was looking at the announcement how the "final action" on the pistol brace rule will be 08/2022. I figured there would be some challenges and decided to hold steady until things shook out. Better cheek weld. I think it’s a legitimate post and am surprised by these comments. They are referring to pistol braces as stocks and the firearms as SBRs. Right so say a 10. 806K subscribers in the guns community. Additionally, the braces are not really designed to be comfortably used from the shoulder, although they certainly can be. A short barrel with a stock has ALWAYS been an SBR. Now I am trying to find a folding pistol brace (which seems to have completely dried up) or a folding adapter that can accept an M4 buffer tube. In that time, you can remove the brace, register it, or swap the barrel (predominantly aimed at aks since the tube has no other function except to take a stock/brace). You can give it away, sell it, maybe even use it as a rifle stock for another gun — just avoid having an unattached brace or stock in your possession at the same time as the pistol. Pistol Brace Recommendations for FGC9? The buffer tube on the stock FGC is kind of thick and I'm not sure what will fit on it, is it generally the move to print a modified brace for it or do any existing products on the market fit it out of the box? The ATF has (unlawfully) decided pistols equipped with stabilizing braces are now considered short barreled rifles and subject to the NFA. It appears there is. I hear ya and I'm aware of what all comes with it, but it's really no different than carrying a spare stock in a range bag with a pistol braced pistol. The Collapsible brace is just ugly and sticks out much too far) The ATF is supposedly making some changes to pistol braces in December 2022. CT residents had been skirting our AWB by configuring AR15's to be >26" OAL, VFG, and a brace to stay outside the definition of a rifle or a pistol by CT's laws as only pistols and rifles were included in the definition of "Assault Weapons. It's currently in it's pistol form and it's got a proper pistol buffer tube on it which a brace cannot be installed on it. You can find more information by googling ATF final rule 2021R-08F. It is very distinctly not a firearm. My understanding is you're a felon if you put a stock on a short barrel without paperwork. "The Department has determined that, as a matter of its own enforcement discretion, it will not, as the NPRM suggested as an option, require individuals and FFLs without an SOT that timely register their affected weapons with a “stabilizing brace,” which are in their possession as of the date this rule is published, to pay the $200 making tax usually due upon And another significant portion access via old. Accordingly, you must submit with the application documentation that establishes the trust possessed the firearm before January 13, 2023. I thought the biggest lie in the proposal was how these pistols equipped with braces are used in crimes. A pistol with a stock is an AOW not an SBR. After you get the amnesty stamp, the switch is allowed. It's still an angled magazine holder. Something about pistol braces being made to be registered with the ATF in accordance with the NFA. Full stop. A couple of other things. Discuss firearms, politics, 2nd amendment news. I get everyone likes an AR pistol. Under the proposed rules different braces have different point values, and things like optics, hand grips, and length of pull also effect scoring. So for me, the 3 looks better on a pistol, because I prefer a modern looking pistol. This has been discussed to death in those numerous other subreddit posts. The way I'd understood it was the difference between a pistol being a pistol and not an SBR was the stock. It pretty much comes in 3 parts. Why is this important? A magazine holder, being designed to hold a magazine, isn't now a forward grip even though it could be used as such. But I ain't going to spend the money on a new brace unless I know it's legally allowed for me to do so. Since it’s not a “pistol” but a “firearm,” it’s a grey area to put a pistol brace on it. there are close to a dozen past subreddit discussions on the soon to be finalized Brace Ban. 23 votes, 21 comments. 5 barrel with a stock is an sbr and with say the sba4 brace its a pistol. •In 2015, the ATF defended their opinion, claiming using a brace as a stock constitutes a weapon “redesign”. There was a deluge of information at the time across the gunnit subs as well as youtube. If it was originally a rifle that was chopped, then it’s a different story. Soam I expected to register a piece of plastic with no serial number? If you ONLY had a pistol upper <16" and a brace/stock, yes. Essentially they are saying anything over 26" is too unwieldy to be shot one handed, and thus the addition of a brace constitutes intent to use it as a rifle instead of a pistol. Oct 5, 2023 · Original pistol braces were aimed at large-format pistols, but when Remington and Mossberg took 12-gauge firearms to the mainstream, a new opportunity opened up. If the ATF deems the pistol brace to be a stock, I still won't have an SBR, as the barrel is a 16 inch barrel. An AR15 with a brace is therefore a pistol by definition. My question is can people put sights on their pistol and shoulder it. Plus the majority of our content creators and visitors are historically long time reddit users. 5" or more would be illegal as it would mean you set the brace up to use as a stock and not a brace. The lowers the stores sell are registered as bolt action repeaters, not semi auto. Why this is dumb: The rules around SBRs were already confusing; any barrel less than 16" is short-barrel, unless you have a welded-on muzzle device that takes it past 16", then it was still OK. " going to agree with SB, it’s an excellent brace, very sturdy, supports forearm well for use as forearm brace and can be shouldered too very well. collapsible, folding, telescoping, etc. Hey guys, can someone please definitively tell me what is going on with pistol braces as of June 2024? I was very interested one but I am scratching my head in confusion on the legality of them with this back and fourth stuff. The buffer tube, brace assembly, and a ring that locks the brace onto the buffer tube. That is 100% false, there never has been an actual law prohibiting the action of shouldering a The shockwave isn't a pistol but it is in a very grey area since it is defined as a "firearm". I may not like braces, but they asked a pretty specific question. It have to do with making of rifle with imported parts and atf states if you have made a rifle with imported parts that is in violation of 922r there is no fixing it. Does that answer ur question? Originally I thought I'd be able to switch the button around, but it's not designed like that. But the gun grabbers aren’t know for being logical. I decided to go with the pistol. 25” -Magpul MBUS -Emissary Hand Brake -Streamlight Protac HLX w/ Cloud Defensive LCS -Magpul Ladder Rails -Glock 19X OEM Mags Of I understand correctly, I could still use a pistol brace on a 16" barreled AR and not run afoul of the NFA, but this configuration wouldn't be exempt from NJ AWB rules the way an "other" is. I gave it two passes with acetone hot vapor smoothing after sanding the largest artifacts. So if you want to use a pistol brace, at least until the lawsuits are done, you need a tax stamp. I got a cmmg rdb action that was advertised as being able to use a carbine buffer. If you place a brace on a firearm with a barrel less than 16", you have created an SBR under the AFT's current interpretation. Therefore, a “pistol grip shotgun” equipped with a “stabilizing brace” and a barrel of less than 18 inches is an NFA “firearm,” i. Instead, if your braced pistol can be separated into an upper (with barrel) and lower (the gun), I would remove the upper and purchase a brand new 16" rifle or a rifle lower (a cheap one probably), without a brace, and form 1 that lower into an SBR. However, because the pistol brace is adjustable, I would need to fix the magazine on it in order to meet the NY SAFE Act. Change my mind? I’m looking for some suggestions for a good low profile and foldable brace or stock system to engage with the spear-lt pistol. Yes I know. Previously, the ATF had flip flopped on wether it was legal to shoulder a brace. But those are less common. Brace for brace, I'd have to give it to the side folding SB brace. Basically shouldering a pistol brace isn’t a felony because the pistol brace is designed to be a brace and nothing more. Regardless, the only question I have is if the brace in question is required to be fixed and unmoving or can it be adjustable (i. People are taking this out of context, the question was ask about pistol and brace , yes, but the atf answer was that 922r got nothing to do with pistol and brace. The brace industry moved quickly to make these a braced platform. Also, it should be noted that for the brace amnesty you don't actually receive a stamp since no tax was paid. I used the angled-not-vertical BCM “vertical”(but not 90° so not technically vertical) front grip on a few builds when I had braces. ) Thank you for any input In my case I will maintain my pistol (built in 1994) as a pistol, and (in my case - you do you) remove the brace from the tube when the 120 day window closes. But then it isn't a brace, as it's a stock. I've had all kinds of pistol braces and I'm replacing the factory folding one on my mpx with an earlier telescopic one that I sourced online, but if you want my opinion on THE best pistol brace I've ever seen so far, it's the Tippmann one that came on my M4-22 Pro pistol. If you have a pistol, you are allowed to put any kind of brace on it you want. Search for the word "brace" in the May 2023 stamp approval megathread on r/NFA and you'll find plenty of approvals. No; the lowers that are on pistols are registered as pistols, which brings me back to what I said. After the ATF Pistol brace policy change hit the national register, I took a "wait and see" approach. " An SBR still has to have a stock. 319K subscribers in the ar15 community. Even if you remove and destroy the brace, on an AR platform, if you have a scope it's still going to be an SBR as the scope is designed to be used while shouldered. " Stock For Stock. The brace rule the ATF tried to pass would have classified braces attached to pistols as stocks. Read Me: More than ***30%*** of our contributing community access reddit via a 3PA… It is a chassis that a P320 pistol locks into that has a brace built into it. 915 votes, 164 comments. The brace itself cannot b disassembled. That being said - i've never cared for the look of a pistol with a "traditional" look (front post, drop in handguards, "stock") being so short. It was a slippery slope on legality that would probabl Thus, the addition of a “stabilizing brace” does not assist with single-handed firing, but instead providessurface area that allows for firing from the shoulder. I think it just comes down to whether you prefer a traditional or modern look. I think his point was that they won't ask and don't care in regards to firearms. 2mm layer height. The current exception is if you modify a brace to be more effectively used as a stock. I am currently deployed overseas. Posts must be somewhat related to firearms and must comply with the Global Reddit Rules. My personal view is that this brace rule will be overturned. 93” -AT3 Tactical Pro Quad Rail 7” -KVP Linear Compensator 4. Welcome to r/AR15! Share you builds, ask relevant questions, play nice etc. , a short-barreled shotgun. No idea what a brace costs, but I personally skipped it and complained that a buffer tube to the shoulder hurts until my tax stamp was Join NAGR They have both pistol brace and FRT cases and members are protected from prosecution on those two items for now Edit: to make sure I don’t sound like a shill for NAGR, Second Amendment Foundation membership also gets you pistol brace “rule” protection, there’s another one as well but I’m a member of NAGR and SAF Ok, so my question is why would they be offering amnesty on an AR pistol that would still be legal per their worksheet? Surely the amnesty period would be for currently legal AR pistols that would then be deemed illegal by the worksheet. I'm pretty sure as long as you put a pistol brace on it, you're legal. MCK is a conversion kit not a firearm. With the Not really every Acr brace or bren 2 stock conversion to a tailhook brace cost 400-500 regardless. Essentially if you Are in possession of an imported pistol with a brace your only options are to destroy it or surrender it to the atf , according to the atf. Stating that "Due to the upcoming Amnesty Registration of Pistol Brace weapons, photos of the weapon being registered will be required to prove the weapon does utilize a pistol brace in its configuration and would qualify for an amnesty registration. TLDR; There are three realistic options you have if you currently possess a rifled non-NFA Other that is equipped with a pistol brace: You can have an other with a 16inch barrel though AS LONG AS OAL IS GREATER THAN 26 but you can not have a brace on it, or other kind of thing that may increase surface area* (*subject to whatever interpretation ATF will say). If you manage to still have a legal pistol, then there would be no need to register in the first place? I've been asking this for a while now. We are now an 18+ only community. As long as it has a pistol brace on it, not a stock, it's an AR pistol, NOT an SBR. The Collapsible is leaps and bounds better. I understand that everyone has questions and concerns, it's normal to be concerned with your well being especially when a governmental body just threatened it, I have the same questions and concerns as everyone else. There's a nationwide injunction against the ATF “ban” and the FPC has recently requested summary judgement (which would, after a process, solidify the ruling and it could no longer be appealed by the ATF. There are numerous past discussions on the ATF brace rule. Should I order the one made by sig or is there a better after market alternative? The Jmac customs lineup looks great but I have no experience. 6 to 8 percent of all pistol braced guns) Any new threads regarding the Pistol Brace ruling will be removed to prevent spam. The SBA4 is much more solid and doesn't bend around much at all, which makes it great for shouldering. Two years ago I put a pistol brace on my . I was gone before the ATF ruling and will still be gone when HB1240 is signed into law. The pistol brace thing is really confusing. The rules about short barrel rifles and tax stamps are bullshit, but so is this argument that arm braces aren’t being bought with the intent to be But I will admit this severely cripples any of the pistol AR/AKs etc. There's a few different types of buffer tube specs but mil-spec is the most common one, and commercial is probably the second most common. e. However, if the length of the firearm has changed you will need to notify the NFA Division. Favorite pistol brace?👇🏼 Looking for recommendations/ pictures of your brace setup before I whip out the card and purchase the SB Tactical G2. The shouldering is also confusing and hope someone can give me some light. 2021R-08F does not specify what exactly makes a braced weapon an SBR or not, giving the ATF discretion to apply the rule as they see fit to individual examples. If you're looking for a pistol brace for your AR-15, There are hundreds of "good" options depending on what you want and how much you want to spend. The five is similar in that way, only real difference between the two is where you prefer your QD the ATF has specifically said in the past that SHOULDERing the pistol brace is lega (not just the sell, but specifically shouldering)l. I refuse to pay for a stamp to shoot my AR pistol with a stock BEFORE I ever shoot in that configuration to see if I want to keep it that way. If someone calls you out for shouldering a brace, tell them to mind their own fucking business; if it’s someone affiliated with the range (employee, owner, RSO, etc), then find a new range. Does anyone know if the final action could be canceling or is it basically set that August 2022 the de facto pistol brace ban will take effect? When KAK contacted the ATF about their blade, they were told a LOP of a pistol brace of 13. Everything said here will be just a rehash of what's been said in many past threads. Once again, the general basics: One could simply remove the brace and use it with just the bare buffer tube and no stock. Since it is now nationwide injunction, people now can use pistol brace on their pistol again and the manufacturer starts selling them again. The operative phrase being 'once you apply'. For a FIXED MAGAZINE format on an AR PISTOL I'm pretty sure you can have a brace albeit a brace is more of a grey area let alone here in California. I found the recoil a bit harsh but changing the buffer weight on the pdw brace w Does anyone know what’s going on with the pistol brace ban. I am thinking about getting an A2 or SMF extended buffer tube so I can more easily shoulder this without a stock attachment. if you’re a member of FPC GOA, a customer of maxim defense (you own one of their braces)Or some of the other 2A organizations you’re in the clear, it was struck down with another injunction in the 5th circuit a few weeks back, and based on the text of it the judge was questioning the legitimacy of SBR laws, braced or stocked. I heard something about a December 28 deadline, but haven’t heard or s en anything about it since. 250 for the stock, 110 for the tailbook and 80 for the adapter total $440. In which case yes, the police / ATF could probably deduce that you bought a braced pistol from the serial numbers. I’m just wondering how many of us would actually charge someone for having an unregistered pcc + brace after the amnesty period. Seems that a lot of people think the stamp is the approval, it is not, it’s just a tax stamp, the approval is the signed form. Pistol brace pros: don't have to register it on the NFA and deal with all that bullshit and lose out on $200 can use it like a SBR Pistol brace cons: maybe slightly less comfortable than a stock depending on which brace you buy fudds may flip out if you shoulder it like a rifle even though the ATF said it's okay SBR pros: The website clearly states that all new members will be sent a welcome kit with a patch etc…at first I attributed it to the high volume of new member joint all at once but it’s been several months now and I still haven’t received any kind of confirmation of my membership in the mail. It’s a shame that even gun related media outlets cannot even get basics of firearm law reporting correct. At that point, I may as well just replace the pistol brace A brace is a brace, it is not a stock, but It can still be shouldered without becoming a stock. IANAL of course, but seems like a Scorpion pistol without a brace is still a pistol. You can keep the brace on a pistol, where you do not have an approved stamp, after the 120 days from the rule being published, but until you get the stamp you can't switch it to a regular stock. Because of this an AR15 with a brace cannot meet the definition of a rifle as the use of a brace is evidence it is intended to be fired with one hand and not shouldered. -Magpul BTR Brace -B5 Systems P23 Pistol Grip -HS503G ACSS on Scalarworks LEAP 1. That was my point of bringing it up since OP was asked to leave for using a pistol brace. An AR pistol with no stock is legal, with a stock is illegal, and a pistol brace is in the air? What are the likelihood a brace is legal comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment I know the pistol brace ban was overturned but I still see booths at gun shows selling ar pistols without a brace. alabamacoastie. Personally I hated the braces and have always preferred even the most simple carbine stock over and brace. It will go back to being legal. TLDR; Written in the Stabilizing Brace Final Rule, ATF has concluded that any foreign-made pistols with stabilizing braces would be assembled in violation of 922(r), (as the firearms are retroactively being considered rifles). Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The author says that the ATF ruled braces cannot be legally shouldered. Depending on what brace you put on it, may make it into an SBR, without the ATF giving you any kind of actual criteria on whether or not that specific brace and gun combination qualifies as an SBR. All my brace searches come up with SB or Sig branded braces. •In 2017, the ATF reversed their opinion, saying use of an unmodified arm brace as a buttstock isn't illegal. 25 caliber pocket pistol. " Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now there will be a proposed “amnesty” period where you can take a picture of your pistol w/brace and I'm currently using the SBA4 pistol brace, and debating for the Magpul MOE stock on a milspec buffer tube. The ATF hasn’t said anything on the subject. reddit (33% of our desktop users) something that is absolutely next on the block. Once the brace ban goes into effect then adding a pistol would make it illegal. I think they sell them separately from the firearms too. But you know what’s even better? An AR pistol with an actual stock, which is an a SBR. The ATF argued that shouldering a brace constituted a redesign of the pistol brace into a stock, therefore creating an unregistered SBR. Loads of people bought just lowers then assembled their own pistol themselves. OR, keep the brace attached and convert your pistol to a proper full length rifle by giving it a 16” barrel. In other words, you've put up with this BS because at least it's better than form 1 your firearm. We value freedom of speech as much as we do the right to keep and bear arms. Hello Wa_guns! I just purchased a ruger charger pistol and have seen many videos online of adding a pistol brace, which is apparently legal as long as you do not intentionally shoulder the firearm. Same as with form 5 approvals (inheritance), no $200 no tax stamp. I have only ever seen range fudds even mention half of these laws. Use the Reddit search feature to search this subreddit. Half of the brace folds down and acts like a shelf for your forearm to counterbalance the weight of the gun, exactly like the hook brace on the stock of a folding SPAS 12. They're all over the place, from 17 to 129 days from a quick glance. If you have ANY other combination of items that the stock or brace can be used for, (rifle with >16" barrel), no. The logic of this is just stunningly stupid. I've owned and shot most of my adult life. I built an AR pistol with the Thordsen Customs brace in FDE: And I used the Scorpion AR pistol grip in FDE/Black: My build came out looking really nice Reply reply. The smaller ones seem like they’d have a much better weight distribution in the absence of a brace. Has the added effect of turning scorpion into UMP at home (without the straight stick mag ofc, thank the CADbros for working on that right now though) If your buffer tube is a mil-spec buffer tube and your brace is a mil-spec compatible brace, then yes it should fit right on and act as any other brace. They said they had a letter, but they never posted it as far as I know. You slapped a pistol brace that works like shit compared to an actual stock to your firearm, went for an angled grip or finger stop as opposed to a hand stop, and limited how far back the brace can more. Yes, I get the state and fed rules don’t align nicely, but in the ATF’s eyes, you’re good. Your friend didn’t pay the tax so no stamp. Either buy it from a store for about $1k, or buy a semi auto registered lower from PPT for more. To be more technical, the guidance states: "Permanently remove or alter the “stabilizing brace” so that it cannot be reattached and thereby removing it from regulation as a “firearm” under the National Firearms Act (NFA). E: The discussion down below was about how restrictive this new system is relative to how things were "pre brace," it is not a discussion on how restrictive these rules are compared to NOW. That’s because no one actually knows. TL;DR: •In 2014, the ATF said that shouldering a pistol brace meant your pistol would be classified as an SBR. Yes. I am going to go for the pistol, and I went to Kriss' webiste and picked up the Gen II hinged upper. This makes the assumption that the firearm in question started life as a non NFA pistol or receiver and not a rifle. I am aware that AK pistols are largely sold as starting points for an SBR, and brace rules don’t change that, but you can’t keep an SBR in your car the way you can keep a pistol. ) . I bought an AR pistol (10. By the way, on the gentlemen’s website, he does show how when installed it can still function as a pistol brace- off the right side with the strap around the right arm or to the left with the left arm. Making a pistol bigger doesn’t make it easier to conceal. Regardless, Abolish the NFA full stop. Functionally, an ar and an ar pistol are the exact same. If you want a VFG, you have to go the SBR route, which gets you the option of using a stock as well. You could add an air soft pistol and it would be legal. While this ruling is being applied to pistols, which are obviously much more prevalent than Shockwave style firearms, if the definition and regulation of a brace changes it could potentially change the classification of the Shockwave. If you have a braced Ruger 10/22 Charger it's an SBR, no way around that, other than removing the brace, destruction of the brace, and removal of scopes. They are legal. With the impending pistol brace ban, I am looking for an alternative. It's a Tailhook brace, which functions differently than the typical SB tactical "strap your arm in" style brace. And folding is much more compact than the Collapsible at the smallest setting (which isn't the case for the true Collapsible stock. That’s where I’m coming from. In my case the removal uses no tools and only takes a few seconds. . We found the round about 23 miles away in a crater the size of the USS It doesn't change the definition of a pistol brace, but scores the whole firearm using a point system for specific features. I haven't shot it yet but plan to in the next couple of weeks. And another significant portion access via old. Has anyone run a rifle length buffer on pistol? The injunction is still in place - the ATF is prohibited from enforcing the brace rule. I live in NY and have an "other" with a pistol brace. The maxim makes tuning your gun super difficult. This is part of the basis of ATF’s pistol brace nonsense, how you can remove the stock (or in this case, the brace) and it is no longer an SBR. My question is, is it okay to run the pistol brace again? I've been looking into doing a form 1 for my AR with the BRN180 but want to get a feel for the setup before making my decision Currently totally legal to use a pistol brace. It’s no different than how a shockwave would work. Yes, once the firearm is registered as an SBR, you can change out the “brace” device or stock for a different brace or stock. Yes, everyone and their mothers know what the brace is for. The deadline is hard set on the 31st. But with the injunction in place, braces are fine on pistols again. More to the point, IMO, is that a tax stamp and stock could be had for somewhere less than $250. Its a combination between the shockwave blade brace and the DDA3 brace. Everyone loves the SBA3. If the firearm scores too many points it's an SBR. I think you're talking about guns like the M&P15-22P - an AR style gun, sold specifically as a pistol with a brace. You may have some injunctive relief if you're a part of the plaintiff groups in some active lawsuits; but that is iffy at best. That being said, what you do is your business, but i would advise against advertising yourself openly like the "will not comply" crowd. Stupid ass SBR laws, not happy. ——————- Question: If a brace was removed so the firearm can't be confused for anything but a pistol, would the brace then have to be destroyed (or removed to another location) in order to be in compliance? What if there are spare parts (buffer tubes and stocks) for other firearms present that could convert a pistol without a brace to an SBR? Thoughts on my new pistol brace? It is printed in Paramount 3d Military Khaki ASA at 0. The upper in consideration is a 16 inch carbine upper ATF Says a Quarter Million Guns Registered Under Pistol-Brace Ban (255,162 applications/Between 0. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. You do not need to contact ATF/NFA because changing the brace/stock does not change the configuration of the SBR. Best bang for the buck, I would probably recommend a SB Tactical SBA3 or SBA4. Posted by u/Unique-Criticism-486 - 1 vote and no comments Posted by u/GlockednLocked - 3 votes and 16 comments I’m looking for a right-side-folding pistol brace that attaches to a 1913 rail like the Sig Brace, that also has a metal strut and not a polymer one. This information is from reddit’s own data. Plus there is no refund for changing to a brace later. The problem is ATF had allowed these things to be sold for 10+ years knowing that most people are shouldering them. A short barrel with a brace WAS considered a pistol and not an SBR. Reply reply More replies This is the popup that appears when filing E-Form 1under the new pistol brace rule " To lawfully register the firearm to a trust, the trust must have possessed the firearm before January 13, 2023. The round that fired was so big it caused a brief solar eclipse, a one mile wide by three mile long swath of trees was leveled and a nearby lake was drained. Since it started as a pistol, they probably now have the advantage of being able to be reconfigured into a pistol just by slapping the brace back on… which is a feature normal SBRs dont have. 5 inch) a few years ago as a truck gun. Yes all pistol brace approvals (final rule) are conditionally approved under the final rule. The fact is, the lower part of the brace is flimsy rubber, and will bend around depending on how you shoulder the brace. Going to go against the grain here and say law folder. It doesn't have a serial number. Or check it out in the app stores Nationwide Pistol Brace Injunction is in place as of 11/08/2023 Pistol Brace Enforcement? I’ve heard a lot of people argue that enforcing the pistol brace ban is a violation of a serviceman’s oath to uphold the constitution. it will have to go up to the supreme court more than likely if Protip: Use the Reddit search feature to search r/CTguns. They are making an exception for previously owned “braced pistols” The last thing almost anyone who bought a brace in the past five years did was buy it in good faith to actualy use as an arm brace for one arm shooting and not wink wink it’s totally not a stock. It's actually legal, (currently at least), to put a >16" upper and stock on a pistol, then remove them and put a <16" upper back in place. Ya dude, some criminal is for sure buy an almost $1,000 firearm like a Stribog or Scorpion, buying a $100 to $200 brace, adding a holographic sight that costs a few hundred, putting an angled grip on the gun and committing a crime with it. Well so is a pistol brace, sawed off shotgun (SBS) or machine gun if you do the proper paperwork. Edit : It seems galils in the US are not imported and made with some US parts. You may want to hold off buying anything else until after that decision. Speculation is they'll likely ban most if not all of the good ones. We will see what happens in the near future if the K9 Killers can pass their new money scheme. Would like to see a way to have a more universal option for the brace model though like a way to attach a tailhook if you wanted. •. I'm just saying that people who are upset about the QD swivel placement (for ease of Magpul to produce and get approved as a brace) just need to turn to The ATF pistol brace rule does specify that many braced weapons, IE: firearms with an attached stabilizing or pistol brace, may be subject to the NFA as they could be SBRs. I went out to the back yard to try it out. If you choose to shoulder it, that’s your choice. Eg, you could use the brace, but you're no better of than using a regular stock since brace=stock and you must have a p&w compensator. They tended to be a lot easier to wield when fitted with a brace and can be quite unwieldy without a brace. That’s why they are making an exemption to “braced pistols” like I mentioned. ry gl yk ac py nv kl to jk nz